Read this Article First
Read this Article First
Composing Hour: Inner Ear Training – Year 1 (Audiation)
Seminars
Seminars
Week 1: Getting Centered on Sound (Total Time: 1:15)
Week 1: Getting Centered on Sound (Total Time: 1:15)
Session 2: Two Tones, One Journey (Total Time: 1:30)
Session 2: Two Tones, One Journey (Total Time: 1:30)
Delayed 7 days
Session 3: Discovering Intervals
Session 3: Discovering Intervals
Delayed 14 days
Session 4: Hiding Tones
Session 4: Hiding Tones
Delayed 21 days
Session 5: Responsive vs. Reactive
Session 5: Responsive vs. Reactive
Delayed 28 days
Session 6: Deepening Tone Awareness
Session 6: Deepening Tone Awareness
Delayed 35 days
Session 7: A Second Flame Beside the Fire
Session 7: A Second Flame Beside the Fire
Delayed 42 days
Session 8: Visualizing the Notes
Session 8: Visualizing the Notes
Delayed 49 days
Session 9: Switching Bodies
Session 9: Switching Bodies
Delayed 56 days
Session 10: Consolidation & Flexibility
Session 10: Consolidation & Flexibility
Delayed 63 days
Session 11: Octave Expansion & Flexibility
Session 11: Octave Expansion & Flexibility
Delayed 70 days
Session 12: Thinking Beyond Perfection
Session 12: Thinking Beyond Perfection
Delayed 77 days
Session 13: The Waves of Harmony – Cluster Deconstruction & Creative Response
Session 13: The Waves of Harmony – Cluster Deconstruction & Creative Response
Delayed 84 days
Session 14: Cluster Stacking & Rhythmic Play
Session 14: Cluster Stacking & Rhythmic Play
Delayed 91 days
Session 15: Resolving the Tension
Session 15: Resolving the Tension
Delayed 98 days
Session 16: Integration, Sustain, & Phrase Control
Session 16: Integration, Sustain, & Phrase Control
Delayed 105 days
Session 17: Dual-Line Thinking
Session 17: Dual-Line Thinking
Delayed 112 days
Section 18: Dual-Line Expansion
Section 18: Dual-Line Expansion
Delayed 119 days
Section 19: Flexibility & Recall
Section 19: Flexibility & Recall
Delayed 126 days
Session 20: Transformation & Variation – Changing the Phrase
Session 20: Transformation & Variation – Changing the Phrase
Delayed 133 days
Section 21: Dual Lines & Pitches
Section 21: Dual Lines & Pitches
Delayed 140 days
Session 22: Parallel Paths
Session 22: Parallel Paths
Delayed 147 days
Session 33
Session 33
Delayed 223 days
Session 34
Session 34
Delayed 230 days
Session 36
Session 36
Delayed 244 days
Session 38: Stability in Motion
Session 38: Stability in Motion
Delayed 258 days
Session 39
Session 39
Delayed 265 days
Session 40
Session 40
Delayed 272 days
Session 42 – Audiation Begins
Session 42 – Audiation Begins
Delayed 286 days
Session 43
Session 43
Delayed 293 days
Session 44
Session 44
Delayed 300 days
Session 45
Session 45
Delayed 307 days
Session 46
Session 46
Delayed 314 days
Session 48
Session 48
Delayed 328 days
Session 49
Session 49
Delayed 335 days
Session 50
Session 50
Delayed 342 days
Session 51
Session 51
Delayed 349 days
Session 52
Session 52
Delayed 356 days
Understanding Depth in Ear Training and Audiation
Many learners expect depth to feel intense, dramatic, or breakthrough driven. In music education, this expectation often comes from procedural training, where the work is intentional, focused, and measurable inside each drill. However, not all forms of musical development operate through that kind of immediacy. Some forms of learning are subtle, cumulative, and perceptual. They work beneath conscious awareness and reveal themselves gradually.
I want to share a little of my teaching philosophy, because it explains why my courses are structured the way they are and why the experience may feel different from what some learners anticipate.
Flawless and the Nature of Subtle Depth
Flawless Ear Training is not deep because of precision. It is deep because it gradually reorganizes auditory perception. This type of depth does not present as intensity within individual drills. It is subtle, and the effects appear in musicianship before they appear as subjective sensations. Learners often notice the results in their playing or listening long before they feel anything “happening” inside the exercises themselves.
Audiation as Conceptual Development
Audiation in The Composing Hour is conceptual rather than procedural. Ear training is procedural and intentional. Audiation is perceptual and cumulative. The depth does not occur within a single exercise. It develops over time as the listener begins to recognize more information within real musical contexts. This is why audiation work can feel light or surface level in the moment, even though the long‑term perceptual changes are significant.
Why Subtle Work Can Feel Superficial
If a learner expects intensity or breakthrough sensations, both courses may appear surface level. When the courses are used as designed, the deeper changes occur gradually and reliably. Subtle work does not always feel deep while it is occurring. It becomes clear only when the ear begins responding differently to music outside the exercises.
On Imperfections and Forward Motion
With the volume of material in these courses, there will be imperfections. These do not affect progress. The ear responds to majorities rather than isolated moments. This is why I encourage students to move forward day by day and not repeat lessons. Repetition of a single example creates a false reference point. Forward motion prevents that. As a result, imperfections do not accumulate and do not shape the ear.
This is also why I ask students to complete the entire lesson rather than isolating specific parts. You do not want to overemphasize the material you are struggling with. You want to encounter it again in a different way on another day, because that is how the ear builds flexible recognition.
Pedagogical Decisions vs. Mistakes
Not everything that appears to be a mistake is a mistake. Some are pedagogical decisions. They reflect choices about how the learning process unfolds. There are multiple valid approaches to course design, and not every learner resonates with the same method. My approach prioritizes real‑time experience over explanation.
Why I Do Not Explain Every Mechanism
I am often asked why I do not describe every mechanism inside the course itself. The reason is simple. If I explained every process as it occurred, the course would become bloated and difficult to use. It would shift the focus away from listening and toward justification. It would also create the impression that I am defending myself or explaining away every choice. That is not helpful for learning, and it would undermine the structure.
The course is designed to work through experience, not through commentary about the experience. Consider how a child learns to count. You do not begin by explaining why one plus one equals two. You show it. The explanation comes later, once the foundational skill is already in place. The same principle applies here.
A Philosophy Rooted in Real Musical Experience
My approach is to keep the learner moving, to take in what is available in real time, and to leave the rest. This mirrors real musical experience. In performance, one cannot pause when something is unclear. The musician adapts, remains present, and continues. That is the skill being trained.
Closing Thoughts
This approach may or may not align with every learner’s preferences, and that is acceptable. But subtle work is not superficial work. It is simply a different kind of depth, one that reveals itself gradually and reliably over time.